The Death of the Statutory  Corporation

The Death of the Statutory Corporation

The statutory corporation went on quietly to the ancestors without the usual Ghanaian fanfare. There was no one to sing of its former glory at its funeral. No one shed a tear for it. No sooner was it covered by the last shovel of earth was it forgotten and confined to neglected history.  It is like the case of the proverbial ‘big man’, who once his position of influence was lost, was shunned until he died penniless, virtually unknown. I wish to tell you a very short story of how it came to be born in these parts; how it lived its life and perhaps why it went away as unceremoniously as it did.

First, it is strange that the statutory corporation should have died in this way. In its heyday, the learned Ghanaian jurist, D.K. Afreh said of it that: ‘Statutory Corporations are growing in importance in Ghana. There are about fifty statutory corporations either established by Acts of Parliament or by instrument under the Statutory Corporations Act. Of these, about forty were established by instruments under the Statutory Corporations Acts, 1959 and 1961.’[1]  His Lordship Justice Afreh, as he later became known, was writing at the time on the then newly passed Statutory Corporations Act, 1964 (Act 232). Before the 1961 Act[2], there was a 1959 Act[3]. Such was the attention that was showered on the statutory corporation that it received the keen attention of the Parliament of Ghana three times in a space of six years. It was clear the high regard in which it was then held.

The Statutory Corporation is one of the means by which business may be conducted through a corporate form. It is distinct from the limited liability company and the unlimited company created under the Companies Act, 1963 (Act 179). It also differs from some of the other forms of organizations which have a more limited purpose under other legislation such as the Trustees Incorporation Act, the Building Societies Ordinance among others.  From the Victorian England to this day, the Statutory Corporation was the means by which governments incorporated business often for a wider public benefit or purpose.

The Statutory Corporation was the vehicle of choice for Ghana’s first post-independence government. In line with his government’s socialist leanings, Kwame Nkrumah, Ghana first President promoted state-led business as the prime driver of the economic growth of the nascent Ghana. ‘Before 1959, statutory corporations had been set up either by Acts of Parliament or registered as public corporations under the old Companies Ordinance.’ The Government of that day did not however find the practice always convenient.

Speaking during the second reading of the Bill Parliamentary Debates for the 1959 Act, Nathaniel Welbeck, then Minister of State, had this to say: “It is frequently desired to create a Government controlled corporation of a type for which the Companies Ordinance is not suitable and often there is no time to prepare a Bill for the purpose, the terms of which have been sufficiently worked out and the result is that not only is Parliament’s time taken up unnecessarily but also no amendment of the provisions governing the corporation can be effected otherwise than by further legislation.”[4]This was a government in a hurry and Nkrumah’s many writings on the early days provide a glimpse into the leadership’s thinking at that time. Clearly, creating ten new state enterprises would have required ten separate legislation. This was both inconvenient and a waste of Parliamentary time, despite the CPP[5]government’s overwhelming control of Parliament. The underlying policy preference for the statutory corporation was thus very clear. 

The statutory corporation was the embodiment of many elements of Ghana pride. The famous Ghana National Trading Corporation (GNTC), the Ghana Industrial Holdings Corporations (GIHOC), Ghana Airways Corporation, Ghana Commercial Bank. It was the big man of its day. These organisations were designed to create a measure of autonomy for state enterprise outside the framework of the old Companies Ordinance and successor Companies Code, 1963 (Act 179). 

How then did it die so lonely? Its neglect started from the Second Republic. With the overthrow of Nkrumah and his socialist government, the shift to increased private participation in the economy began. The clearest policy shift perhaps started with Dr. Busia’s Progress Party government which promoted itself at being at pole odds with Dr. Nkrumah’s fiercely socialist government. Then came the succession of military governments between 1972 and 1979. These events may have given the statutory corporation the chance for recovery. There were however very few additions of any lasting noteworthiness. 

The years between 1982 and 1992, ushered in the PNDC[6]and the long years of the Structural Adjustment Programmes and economic liberalisation. The then reclaimed taste for a more liberal economy with less state intervention took a foothold. The Statutory Corporations were however still alive and relatively well, if not profitable or seeing many new births.

The infection that triggered the slow death of the Ghanaian statutory corporation came in 1993 in the form of Act 461. This 1993 Act known more formally as the Statutory Corporations (Conversions to Companies) Act, 1993 was perhaps the last and clearest indication of the shift of the Ghanaian state from its preference of the use of the statutory corporation to the company limited by shares for the transaction of state-led profit-oriented enterprise.

By one fell swoop, Act 461 changed the corporate spirits of 32 largely state-owned corporations and converted them by sudden fiat into companies limited by shares. Why this happened still remains unclear. Perhaps government suddenly realized that it had to conduct its business in much the same way as the ordinary Ghanaian did? Through the company limited by shares? The corporations that were infected by the 1993 bug included notables like Agricultural Development Bank, National Investment Bank, Ghana Commercial Bank, Electricity Corporation of Ghana, Ghana Airways Corporation, Ghana National Petroleum Corporation, Ghana Cocoa Board Ghana National Trading Corporation, Ghana Publishing Corporation, State Insurance Corporation and the Ghana Trade Fair Authority. Many of these companies still remain today. While their corporate form and sometimes ownership changed, their importance in everyday Ghanaian life however remains. The one true explanation for Act 461 was perhaps to continue the policy of divestiture which had been in the 1980s. There was some push for government to concentrate on governance and to leave business to the private sector. For many of these converted companies however, government continued to keep its shareholding, by and large.

For the older Ghanaian however it may seem that nothing changed at all. It is not out of place for the pensioner to complain about the services of ‘Electricity Corporation’. These entities occupy the same buildings and are often governed in much the same way as before. It continues to be a merry go round of management wheeling in and wheeling out as the political winds blow. These ‘corporations’ are however not what they used to be. The statutory corporation is dead. The company limited by shares is its heir. It is ‘a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.’[7]This is how the statutory corporation died with no one to mourn it.

[1]DK Afreh, Legislation: Statutory Corporations Act, 1964 (Act 232) [1964] VOL. I NO. 2 UGLJ 144—147

[2]The Statutory Corporations Act, 1961 (Act 41)

[3]Statutory Corporations Act, No 53 of 1959

[4]N. A. Welbeck (Minister of State) during the second reading of the Bill Parliamentary Debates, November 9, 1959, quoted by Afreh, n.1, 144

[5]Convention People’s Party

[6]Provisional National Defence Council

[7]2 Corinthians 5:17 (b), King James Version

Kenneth Ghartey is Corporate, Commercial and Insolvency Lawyer and Chartered Valuer. He is Lecturer at the University of Ghana School of Law. He was formerly Senior Lecturer and Head of the Law Department of Lancaster University Ghana. Kenneth's teaching and research includes Company Law & Governance, Commercial Law, Securities Law and Regulation, Insolvency Law and Natural Resources and Environmental Law.

Share This


Wordpress (8)
  • comment-avatar
    J. B Dickson 5 years

    Interesting dicovery for the 20th Century children Mr. Ghartey.

  • comment-avatar
    Albert Agyepong 5 years

    I enjoyed the article but it feels like a teaser. I thought there would be a focus on ECG considering recent happenings and perhaps such analysis would espouse further reasons why the statutory corporations are dying.

  • comment-avatar
    Dickson Agbogah 5 years

    Good material for my students. Thanks, Ken

  • comment-avatar
    John Kojo Denanyoh 4 years

    This article provides answers to why I can’t find anywhere that the Ghana Broadcasting Corporation (GBC) was set up as a Public Service Broadcaster (PSB) under the statutory corporation Act, 1964 (Act 232). At the Supreme Court library, I found the pages where the law should be expunged from the book. I searched the Padmore Library, the national archives but could not find it, so was the state publishing corporation. Why have we taken it out of the books completely? Can I quote anywhere that the legal basis for referring to GBC as a public service broadcaster is the statutory corporation Act, 1964 (Act 232). Today GBC calls itself as a PSB, what is the legal basis?

    • comment-avatar

      There was actually a Ghana Broadcasting Corporation Decree, 1968 (NLCD 226).
      I am not sure if it is law i.e. if it is still on the books.
      This will make GBC a PSB.

  • comment-avatar
    Kenneth Ghartey 4 years

    There was actually a Ghana Broadcasting Corporation Decree, 1968 (NLCD 226).
    I am not sure if it is law i.e. if it is still on the books.
    This will make GBC a PSB.

  • comment-avatar
    John Denanyoh 4 years

    I know that 1968 (NLCD 226) is what is in the books now. At the Supreme Court library, I found the page where Act 232 should be. It was torn from the book. When I showed it to the librarian, he was surprised it’s been removed. So NLCD 226 is an amendment of Act 232. I guess it’s obsolete so it’s been done away with. In Bagbins presentation at GBC at 80, he referenced Act 232 as the source of GBCs public service remit and insisted that GBC has lost its original focus. Was wondering if the proper way to clean the book is to tear the page out of the it.

  • Disqus ( )