Abstract The doctrine of proprietary estoppel is based on reliance by the claimant on representations or encouragement from the legal owner of the land. It serves as a shield for the claimant because of these representations or assurances. In such cases, the legal owner may lose their interest in the land if it is well...
Author: Derick Adu-Gyamfi (Derick Adu-Gyamfi)
Locus Standi of a Stranger to a Judgment: Analysis on the Decisions in Jacques v Harrison , Gbagbo v Owusu & Lamptey v Hammond
Introduction A brief discussion on the origin of the term ‘locus standi’ or simply standing will be very useful to readers for the purpose of better clarity of the article. Origin of the doctrine In England, during the 19th century, courts were reluctant to allow anyone gain entry into its sanctuary unless he is a...
The Doctrine of Continuous Violation: Can It Be Caught by the Doctrine of Estoppel and the Statute of Limitation?
“On principle of public policy nobody should be allowed to take advantage of his own wrong.”[1] Introduction With this doctrine the decision in Bodner v Banque Pariba[2] comes to mind. The court held thus: “’Federal courts have found the statute of limitations must accrue from the date of the last wrongful act where there is...
Summary Judgment: A Cliché in Summary Disposal of Cases in Liquidated Claims
Introduction Summary judgment is one given in favour of a plaintiff without a plenary trial of the action. The normal steps of filing all necessary pleadings, hearing evidence of witnesses and addresses by counsel thereafter before the court’s judgment are not followed. The materials on which such is based are the writ of summons, statement...
Default Judgment and the Doctrine of Estoppel Per Rem Judicata: A Legal Conundrum in Order 10 Rule 6 & Order 13 Rule 6(2) of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2004 (C. I 47)
Voice Summary by Author: Introduction Meaning of default judgment Default judgment is a judgment which is not on its merits but a judgment based solely on the inability of a respondent to the application to file appearance or defence within the statutory periods set down by the rules.[1]This can be argued that a default judgment...
Joinder of a Juristic Entity in an Article 64 Petition: A Slippery Slope in Civil Procedure Practice in Ghana
Introduction It is fundamental in litigation that parties must commence action against relevant parties to the suit. A plaintiff who conceives that he has a cause of action against a defendant is entitled to pursue his remedy against that defendant and cannot be compelled to proceed against other persons whom he has no desire to...
Arguing Points of Law Under The Omnibus Ground Of Appeal: The Decision in Owusu Domena v Amoah Revisited.
Introduction Grounds of appeal are the complaints in a judgment which touch upon issues of fact, law or procedure in a case, which if upheld will lead to an appeal being allowed. The grounds of appeal are the alleged errors of law or fact constituting the defects in the judgment and which are relied on...
Has the decision in Adisa Boya v Mohammed (Substituted by) Mohammed & Mujeeb eroded the powers of executors or administrators in the distribution of an estate of a deceased person? Is the decision in Okyere (decd) (substituted by Peprah) v Appenteng & Adomaa still good law?
Introduction This article brings to mind the words of Thomas Paine, when he stated as follows in 1796 “Nothing they say, is more certain than death, nothing more uncertain than the time of dying.”[1] Who are an executor and an administrator? The Wills Act, 1971 (Act 360) does not define who an executor is or...
The Bolam Test: An Unfair Decision in the Torts of Professional Negligence.
Photo by Sharon McCutcheon on Unsplash Introduction In his book, Winfield and Jolowicz on Torts, by Rogers W.V.H 13th edition, Sweet and Maxwell, the learned author defined negligence as: “Negligence as a tort is the breach of a legal duty to take care which results in damage, undesired by the defendant, to the plaintiff. Thus...
Can a Concubinage Relationship be Equated to a Valid Customary Marriage? The Decision in Mintah v Ampeyin in Retrospect.
Introduction Customary law has been defined under Article 11(3) of the Constitution 1992 as: “Rules of law which by custom are applicable to particular communities in Ghana.” These include the rules of customary law that have been determined by the Superior Courts of Judicature. Customary law therefore, is now part of the common law of...